Recently, our website briefly lifted its paywall, allowing readers to access various articles from both current and past editions. This prompted me to reflect on my earlier columns, many of which painted a rather bleak picture of the economy in recent months.

Much of the pessimism seemed warranted. The economy has faced stagnation, and the Chancellor has encountered numerous challenges. Inflation continues to be a concern, and the tax burden—already at unprecedented levels—is expected to rise next month with significant increases in employers’ national insurance contributions, potentially threatening many businesses.

Despite widespread pessimism, there are early indications that the situation might be improving. Politically, Sir Keir Starmer has stepped into a more decisive role, particularly regarding Ukraine. Moreover, several government officials seem to be becoming more effective in their positions after an initial rocky period.

In currency markets, the pound has appreciated to $1.30 against the dollar, which, while partly due to a weakened US dollar, is notable nonetheless. Just a few weeks ago, there were comparisons being made between Rachel Reeves’s potential tenure as Chancellor and the troubled Liz Truss era.

The US stock markets have experienced turmoil under Donald Trump’s presidency, while the London market has surpassed New York’s performance this year for the first time in a significant while. The FTSE 100 index has climbed more than 5 percent this year, contrasting with a 4 percent decline in the S&P 500.

Beyond just currency, the UK’s stock market has also navigated the volatility stemming from Trump’s presidency without a similar decline against the euro.

There have been more optimistic developments as well. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) recently revised its UK growth forecast down from 1.7 to 1.4 percent, which some interpreted as a setback for Reeves. However, this adjustment was made within the context of a broader softening of global growth expectations and reflects the stagnant economy from the latter half of last year. As I’ve mentioned before, GDP figures can be sensitive to past performance as much as future estimates.

Interestingly, despite the downgrade, the UK remains positioned second only to the US in growth forecasts among G7 nations for the current year. Should US policies negatively impact their economy as anticipated, it’s conceivable that the UK could achieve the fastest growth rate in the G7 sooner than expected.

I recognize the potential risks of sharing a more positive narrative about the UK economy before the Chancellor’s upcoming economic update. We know that the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) is likely to lower its growth forecast, which had been optimistic at around 2 percent in October.

We will also observe the Chancellor’s attempts to ensure compliance with her fiscal rules, a task that has proven complicated due to rising debt interest costs. Some experts described Reeves’s strategy in the last budget as a “rookie error,” as it left little flexibility for potential adjustments.

It appears there will not be significant tax modifications at this stage, with further budget discussions slated for the fall; instead, welfare cuts and reductions in spending limits will aim to alleviate financial pressure. Following the Chancellor’s statement, perhaps we will look back and question the extent of the concern.

This sentiment isn’t solely mine; Deutsche Bank analysts visiting clients in New York earlier this month reported surprising positivity regarding UK government bonds and the economy.

As noted by Deutsche’s Sanjay Rana, there was an emerging optimism surrounding the UK economy during their meetings, which is a notable shift.

Reasons for this optimism include: a shift towards deregulation in the UK; the potential for a more substantial trade deal with the EU focused on minimizing non-tariff barriers; increased defense spending in Europe benefiting the UK’s defense sector; and the expectation that the UK will maintain a favorable position with the US as a trade war unfolds.

Moreover, Will Hobbs from Barclays pointed out that the consensus remains overly pessimistic about the UK’s medium-term economic prospects.

In addition, while the Bank of England maintained its official interest rate at 4.5 percent last Thursday, Governor Andrew Bailey emphasized a gradual approach towards possible rate cuts. The UK has more capacity for lowering borrowing costs compared to the US, which could bolster growth.

On the employment front, recent data indicates that job numbers are stable, and wages are increasing at a rate surpassing inflation, a trend observed for nearly two years. Job vacancies have stabilized, and the latest consumer confidence index showed a modest improvement. Although the current reading of -19 may not seem substantial, it is significantly higher than two years ago, suggesting an eventual uptick in consumer spending.

Even with the burden of US tariffs on certain goods, the UK’s economy is less exposed compared to others. Services account for the majority of UK exports to the US, amounting to £126 billion in 2023, and are not subject to tariffs.

Furthermore, recent events have improved the prospect of closer trade ties with the EU, although the government will proceed cautiously, and favorable terms will not be easily negotiated.

While the slight easing of negativity is promising, it doesn’t imply that all challenges have been resolved. The government’s growth strategy, which has at times appeared counterproductive, still lacks robust implementation, despite discussions of stimulating growth. An industrial strategy is still awaited, although a green paper has been published.

Although I can’t guarantee that more gloomy observations won’t arise in the future, it is essential to recognize any signs of cautious optimism that emerge.

PS

In a related note, the World Happiness Report was released recently, reflecting the sustained efforts of economist Lord Layard, who continues to be active at age 91. The report indicates that happiness is not solely dependent on economic conditions, with Finland topping the list once again, followed closely by Denmark. In contrast, the UK slipped to 23rd place, down three spots, while the US is just behind at 24th.

Layard emphasizes that while governance is often thought to be tied to economic performance, well-being is a more critical factor. The decline in happiness in the US since 2012 has correlated with political shifts following each election. While the Conservatives won in 2019 amidst favorable well-being metrics, they faced significant losses last year as those metrics deteriorated.

Layard is optimistic that the emphasis on enhancing well-being will be central to the upcoming summer government spending review, posing the question of whether well-being can be improved amid tightening budgetary constraints set to be announced by the Chancellor this week.

Contact: [email protected]